Since, obviously, I’m not maintaining this blog, I thought I would let folks know that I am (sort of, kind of, trying, thinking about) maintaining my faculty blog over this way. I haven’t thought all this through yet. I might cross-post a lot of stuff. Or I might devote that blog to serious stuff, this one to whimsical stuff. I don’t know. But in case you’re you’re wondering what I’m doing, professionally, head on over there.
It seems to me that if you supported one community-funded independent creative work that tells the story of an important chapter in American Buddhist history, well then you should support another community-funded independent creative work that tell story of an important chapter in American Buddhist history.
An earlier iteration of my online self would have jumped on this one, a piece by the Angry Asian Buddhist regarding the Buddhism portal on the religion website Patheos. I’m not really interested in having a debate I’ve had before all to no avail. But I was contacted by @cherryblossom on Twitter today about one aspect of this debate that I think needs closer attention.
I don’t have much to say on the “Occupy” movement, though I’ve been thinking about it quite a bit. I don’t have much to say because I haven’t had the time or energy to really look into (one of the consequences of being a new dad). But in those moments that I have had, it seems more than a little clear to me that one of the reasons the usual media suspects don’t know how to handle it is because it is a movement that truly transcends the usual dichotomies of American public discourse.
We’re trying something new over at the Institute: faculty pages. So I’ve set up a blog to show off my more, shall we say, “professional” side. The only reason why some of you may care is that I’ve posted either PDFs or direct links to my publications and conference papers. At least the ones I […]